Licence to kill?

1st Post Mortem report: "He died from fluid in the lungs. No foul play."

2nd Post Mortem report: "... found 42 other marks, burns and contusions from the sole of his feet right up to his head.... suffered hemorrhaging in his trachea, chest, spleen, stomach, the back of his neck and spine, and there were also signs of hemorrhaging in his heart. The soles of his feet had many bruises caused by beatings and he also suffered blunt trauma to his skull."

1st Post Mortem: ... "only examined the body from the chest up."

2nd Post Mortem: ... "examined the entire body."

And it took the family of a dead suspected car thief to pick out what the professionals missed.

We've got a death in police custody case, and they got the cheek to say "only examined the body from chest up", and still missed the "hemorrhaging in his trachea, chest... back of neck and spine... blunt trauma to skull". I want to pengsan already. They hired schoolchilren to do post-mortem?

It all stinks to the core. And all these blunder for the death of a suspected car thief? There must be prawns behind the stone.

Like this also can cover up, apa lagi the Mongolian case, the Correct-correct-correct case... how la to tell children to respect cops?

We can start producing CSI Malaysia.

From HERE.